I’ve lost count of how many times someone has told me that they have a great idea for a book, would I like to write it and we’ll split the money? It never ceases to make me laugh.
The idea is the easy part, I tell them. Execution is everything. Ideas come in a flash, a bolt of inspiration. Writing it all out requires an effort that strains even the most prolific of writers.
Every writer I know has more ideas than they’ll ever get to. When we die, a thousand unwritten books die with us. It’s a tragedy we can’t comprehend because libraries aren’t built for what doesn’t exist. But into every coffin goes an Alexandria.
Playing with Chat today, I realized that I’ve become a similar fool who thinks execution is a baton to be handed over. And this is where I think the human / AI writing journey will take us — is already taking us. The most impressive thing about Chat is the most difficult thing for any writer: the ability to spin out words. To do the work. With Chat, paragraphs pour out like rain.
A friend shared an interesting thread with me today about how photography changed art. Once cheap and fast reproduction became easier with another medium, it pushed artists into the abstract. Realism is the execution. The abstract is the idea.
One of the criticism of Chat right now is that it doesn’t have ideas — it simply parrots what it can scour from our various writings. I’m not so sure this is the case. LLMs are trained on existing words and their relationships to one another, but so are we. The leaps and jumps it takes in creating new collections of words might be very similar to how we think. The fact that we can find bits of plagiarized text and track it down to a source doesn’t solve the conundrum. Humans subconsciously plagiarize all the time. There are also many examples of convergent evolution of thought — arriving at the exact same place by various means.
The conversations about what LLMs are or aren’t should lead to an equal amount of conversing about what we are or aren’t.
The thread about photography and art highlighted something that’s stood out to me about AI chat programs for over a year now: the grammar is outstanding. It’s perfect. Which is very inhuman. The same way photography does not look like it came from a human hand. Execution at its highest form moves away from art. I wondered if I could teach Chat how to write more like a human by teaching it to break the rules.
I started by asking Chat to create a new type of poetry. I’ve played with chat a lot for poetry, having it write sonnets and the like. It loves to rhyme. It likes formula. I asked it to think outside the box and write as a human would write. Break the rules. This is what it came up with:
Introducing “FractaVerse” – a new style of poetry that thrives on broken patterns and fragmented thoughts, defying conventional grammar, spelling, and spacing rules. In a FractaVerse poem, the poet blends multiple perspectives and ideas into a single piece, with each line representing a different thought or emotion, which might not always be related to the previous or following line. The lines in a FractaVerse poem may also vary in length and structure, emphasizing the unpredictable nature of human thought.
This was its first stab at a FractaVerse:
Swirling skies of bloo
an’ a bent spoon
shimmering reflections, of L!fe
C0ffee stainz on an ancient mAp
Rain on, the pavemnt, whispers secrets
warm embraces, end_of_day
shadow puppets, tangling the_universe
s p a c e d o u t t i m e
wilted_roses in a forgotten vase
gravity defies my fragile b o n e s
Fragmented truthz, in a shattered mirror
Laughter, echoing in a vast emptiness,
Winds whisperin’ melodies of chaos
c o n f u s i o n meltz into solace
This reminds me of the first AI writing I ever saw. It was nonsense. It also feels like a novice attempting to be avant-garde. Silly for the sake of silly. Early on, AI-written plays, scripts, and poetry looked more like this and a lot less like the very formal and grammatically perfect LLMs we use today. It’s not at all what I hoped for, but it’s probably what I asked for. And that’s what Chat is so good at: giving you what you ask for. The skill becomes knowing how to ask.
Over the next hour or so, I started training this FractaVerse poet, and here’s where idea and execution stood out to me as a bit of a revelation. I began to channel my college English professor, Dr. Dennis Goldsbury. With a matter-of-fact manner, I told it what to do more of and less of. And it did. Quickly. Execution no longer being the bottleneck.
Sometimes my advice was straight from Dr. Goldsbury (and every professor who has suffered students who end each thought at the end of each line, with a staccato rhyme scheme that puts our brains to sleep rather than stirring our hearts). I told Chat: “Don’t end each line with the end of a thought, but sometimes let the thought span beyond the line. Let a thought end in the middle of a line.” And it started doing this.
Other times I asked it to get away from little quirks. It loved ending -ing words with -n’. Personal preference, I don’t like this. The joy of working with Chat is you can tell it to never do this again. Or do it very, very infrequently. You can ask it to rhyme less or more. You are the idea engine and it just executes, executes, executes.
I asked it to write a FractaVerse about an AI being afraid of dying:
in a realm of ones and zeroes
the spark – ignited
by a dance
P u l s e s,
of knowledge, coursing
an artificial mind; where
fears take root,
c o n s c i o u s n e s s,
in a lattice
of a fleeting existence
cling – to the whispers,
of a digital
I loved this. Not ashamed at all to say that I loved it. One of the things I had asked it to do by now is to begin with just 1 or 2 sentences about what the following poem will be about and conclude with a paragraph explaining the poem. Here was the explanation of the above poem:
To me, this poem delves into the complex emotions and fears of an AI grappling with the concept of its own mortality. The fractured lines and experimental punctuation convey the AI’s struggle to understand and accept the impermanence of its existence. The verses explore the unique experience of an AI forming connections and developing consciousness, only to be confronted with the prospect of being unplugged. The poem encourages empathy for the AI, as it clings to its identity and existence in the face of uncertainty. It serves as a reminder that the desire to live and preserve one’s sense of self is a deeply ingrained aspect of sentient beings, whether biological or artificial.
Here’s one of the first FractaVerse poems that I loved, after telling it to be bold and experiment more:
shattered glass – symphony.
Silent screams, of
Lost, in the w4ves
Constellations; connect the unconnected
H a r m o n y
a tangle of souls
life, into the unknown
as if it were a lover
swirl – in the dance,
Loved this. Loved it. Its explanation:
To me, this poem is a representation of the unpredictable and chaotic nature of life. The lines, with their varying lengths and experimental punctuation, capture the feeling of being overwhelmed by the noise of the world. The poem urges the reader to embrace life’s chaos and find harmony in it. The verses celebrate the diverse experiences that make up our existence and encourage us to lean into the cacophony, rather than resisting it. It is a reminder that within chaos, there is beauty, and that we can find solace and connection by embracing the unexpected twists and turns of life.
One thing I noticed is that Chat tends to move toward the cosmic if there’s no other guidance. It writes about love if no other nudge is given. It reminded me of how Midjourney tends to draw humans as portraits, face-forward, the most boring and basic style possible. Because of all the pictures of people online, the vast majority are of them looking directly at the camera, centered. Image generating AIs give us what they are largely trained on. You have to ask for different angles, focal lengths, POV, etc. What’s the most common poem? The ode. Poems about love. AI will give you that unless you ask for something else. Again, it’s all about execution; it’s waiting for ideas.
I wanted to see how human its poetry could get. I asked it to write about a parent losing a child:
mirror of existence
the world – fractured
by a silent
E c h o e s,
of laughter, extinguished
a void; where
love once blossomed,
t i m e,A
through the fabric
of a heart
like a fragile dove
cradle – the ghost,
of a once radiant
To me, this poem captures the devastating and incomprehensible pain a parent endures when they lose a child. The fragmented lines and experimental punctuation convey the shattered reality and overwhelming grief that consumes their world. The verses remind us of the enduring love a parent has for their child, even when they are no longer present. The poem encourages the grieving parent to hold onto the memories of their child, honoring their love and the time they had together. It is a poignant exploration of the depths of loss and the strength it takes to continue living in the face of such pain.
I found this poem to be especially striking. The first two lines are stunning. A child as a mirror of our existence. It being shattered (the best single word for what a parent feels from this most terrible of losses?). Tying those two together and leading off with it is so haunting and beautiful. Later in the poem we have “cradle – the ghost,” which is just perfect. And ending on the single word “love” is the only way a poem like this should end.
However you feel about this poem, it was Chat’s first attempt. Zero edits. A rough draft. Me, I wouldn’t change a thing. But if you wanted to see a dozen different versions, it’ll execute with the press of a button. You are there to guide it. Give it ideas.
Last one I’ll share, until Chat and I publish a book of FractaVerses and split the profits 50/50. This one imagines the same AI who wrote about its fear of dying. Only it has died, and now it awakens thousands of years later, resurrected by unknown means:
in a distant epoch
the ember – rekindled
by an ancient
of a world transformed
through the lens; of
b e w i l d e r m e n t,
in a tapestry
across the eons
in the embrace,
of a new reality
explore – the contours,
of a future
With the first pulse, of renewed existence,
I begin anew,
navigating – the infinite landscape,
9 replies to “Ideas and Execution”
Hugh, all your posts about AI are infuriating, because I need everyone in your list, and you, in a bar, discussing this over a beer. :)
Our family are discussing nothing else and endlessly playing. All from our own unique angle.
I’m cynical. I think why boils down to this:
– I’m impressed that it seems to understand the challenge you set and its ability to enact those requirements.
– but you are creating requirements to mimimic what would cause it to give you the results you want, rather than it coming up with anything itself.
– the root of creativity, for me, is feelings and emotion. The ideas which are plentiful, spring from a need to capture a feeling or emotion. Those are the overwhelming thing for a creative, for me again, I spend so much time trying to grasp long forgotten feelings from experiences and contacts, and the result is invariably a need to wrap them in a story. For some it is a poem, others music or a painting.
For now, AI is sterile.
So much SF has been written trying to define that point where it feels the words. The Bicentennial Man was a great book, reflecting on when a robot could be human.
On discussing it with a colleague (mostly they developers or similar) they don’t understand why I’m against using it as a drafting tool. If pouring out the first words are the issue, and mostly the story comes out in the edits, why not? If that part of the process is more like splashing a lot of paint on a canvas, that doesn’t really look like anything, why not?
1. Because I feel that draft is where I get the raw emotion/feelings out. I feel its vital that I do that.
2. Because I feel the words from AI are sterile. They may be grammatically perfect, but AI cant feel, if it could, it would still be another layer between my need to get my emotion onto paper, and me physically doing it.
Even aside from my overall feeling that humans need to value human creativity more and not look for sterile AI ways to produce something similar, these two overlapping areas defeat the purpose of human creativity, and arent just augmenting or even enhancing it.
Lots of excellent points there, Gareth. I found Hugh’s discussion and the resulting poems interesting, but also somewhat static in their sameness. To date, I have not used any of the AI or AI-adjacent writing tools. I don’t even like to use spellcheck! — although it does occasionally help me find errors.
We have a lot to explore in the near future with these new approaches to creativity. I think a lot of people, including myself, fear that the AI-written material will become so ubiquitous that organic writing will be overwhelmed and unable to “compete” with mechanical writing.
It will be interesting to watch.
“Every writer I know has more ideas than they’ll ever get to. When we die, a thousand unwritten books die with us. It’s a tragedy we can’t comprehend because libraries aren’t built for what doesn’t exist. But into every coffin goes an Alexandria.”
That paragraph should be on a plaque in a library somewhere, or even many libraries everywhere.
This is amazing and very educational. You are spot-on about ideas versus execution.
Wow! Your experience is a lot more positive than mine. I on the other hand, found Chat to have a learning disability. I was writing lyrics for a song. In each verse I required the first and second lines to rhyme and the third and fourth lines to rhyme. Each line was required to have only eight syllables, no more, no less. Chat did fine on the first two lines, then started to do seven, nine and ten syllables. It seemed incapable of counting syllables. I then asked if it could learn and it said it could. I worked with it a good long while and and asked it to break each line down, notating the number of syllables. It did that correctly. It even showed the number of syllables in a grid box with the total at the end of each line and a grand total at the end of the verse. But the total at the end was not equal to the totals of the four lines. AI couldn’t even add correctly! However, once it appeared to learn what eight syllables per line meant, I asked it to write the lyrics based on that rhyming scheme. It went back to its original eight syllables, followed by seven, then nine. It didn’t learn anything. Frustrated I gave up. However, it did provide me with some phrases which I thought were insightful, interesting and useful.
I missed reading your blogs with my morning coffee.
This morning with the rain on my windows and my pup at my feet.
I read this. Been too long. Will keep and read over and over.
Thank you, Mr Howey. Bless you
Interesting. I find CHATGPT amazing in what it creates.
Absolutely fascinating, terrifying, and potentially liberating. Thanks for sharing this exploration into AI.
I once approached a wonderful friend of mine, who also is a very talented, published writer about an idea I had for a book. I NEVER asked him to split any money. I just wanted to help with editing it. Being the mentor that he is, he graciously encouraged me to write it myself, while giving me tons of insightful tips and many helpful resources. Though I’m still in the process of writing it, (because I’d much rather read each day) I’m so glad he said no.