It hit me in the summer of 2012. That’s when I realized print was on the way out and digital was here to stay. And it was major publishers who taught me this.
At the time, I was doing very well with Wool. It had hit the NYT list a couple times, had sold hundreds of thousands of copies, and the Ridley Scott film deal was in place. I live a simple life, so I had more money than I needed. It put me in a generous mood. To my agent’s dismay, I told her that I would give my print rights to a publisher for a song. As long as they only got the print rights.
No dice. Nobody wanted the print rights. But they would give me $1,500,000 for the print PLUS the digital.
So, Print = $0
Print + Digital = $1,500,000
As has been soundly demonstrated by industry veterans in recent days, I’m a college dropout and a dumb hick, but I could see some sort of truth in these offers I was getting. Digital was worth something. Print wasn’t worth much.
Holly Ward, who is very likely the #1 indie author in the world right now, concurs. She says:
Someone asked about paper only deals – NO ONE IS INTERESTED. I thought that was insane, but it’s not. It lines up with Hugh’s report. Paper is not where the money is at- ebooks are… I’m thinking there is a reason why the trad pubs are backing off of paper sales. It’s not arbitrary, despite their other actions I think they’re right about paper.If Indies stopped chasing paper, if they stopped thinking that paper would be the difference, well, that would be major.”
There’s a great thread here about Holly turning down major deals from publishers and why. Fantastic read.
Today on AuthorEarnings.com, we posted some charts and thoughts on self-published authors giving up print sales. Turns out that traditionally published authors are giving up even more.
13 replies to “Print: Not all it’s cracked up to be.”